LATEEF AHMAD MOCHI AND ORS. v. SANTOSH D VAIDYA AND ANR. (FINANCE / ACCOUNTS AND TREASURIES)
CCP(S)/404/2023 · 2025-11-03
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13301 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13301 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 73 Reg Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 404/2023 in[WP(C) 963/2022] CM(1210/2025) CM(3250/2025).
LATEEF AHMAD MOCHI AND ORS.
…Petitioner (s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
SANTOSH D VAIDYA AND ANR.
Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 03-11-2025
01. Compliance report has been filed on behalf of the respondents.
02. In the said report, it has been submitted that in compliance to the directions of the Writ Court, the claim of the petitioners for enhancement of wages at the rate of Rs. 225 per day with effect from 20th April, 2022 was considered vide the Government Order No. 101-F of 2025 dated 24.03.2025 in terms of SRO 460 of 2017 read with Government Order No. 27-F of 2018 dated 25.01.2018. It has further been submitted that payment to all the petitioners has been made in full and that the judgment of the Writ Court has been duly complied with.
03. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to dispute the aforesaid position.
04. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings are closed and the petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 03-11-2025 Showkat Khan