Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13301 (AP)

SMT.B.SAVITHRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT v. ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY & ANOTHER

WP/1206/2011 · 2025-07-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

t it. APHC010159902011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1206 OF 2011 Between: Smt. B.Savithri, W/o.Late Hari Hara Pratap, Hindu, aged about 52 Senior Assistant, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District years ...PETITIONER AND 1. Acharya Nagarjuna University , Rep. by its Registrar, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur 2. The Executive Counsel of the Nagarjuna University, rep. by its Secretary & Registrar, Nagarjuna University, Guntur ...RESPONDENTS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing NTS/Suspension/2010 dated 11.8.2010 issued by the respondents and ultra vires to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution besides being in violation of principles of natural justice besides to proceed further. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India No.ANU/Estt- as illegal, of india and directing not lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 1467 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings bearing No.ANU/Estt- NTS/Suspension/2010 dated 11.8.2010 issued by the respondents pending final disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. V. S. H. SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI M.CHALAPATHI, SC FOR NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY The Court made the following order: APHC010159902011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1206/2011 Between: 1.SMT.B.SAVITHRI,W/O.LATE HARI HARA PRATAP, SENIOR ASSISTANT, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, NAGARJUNA NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, NAGARJUNA NAGAR, GUNTUR. 2.THE EXECUTIVE COUNEL OF THE NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY & REGISTRAR, NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing No.ANU/Estt-NTS/Suspension/2010 dated 11.8.2010 issued by the respondents as illegal, and ultra virus to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and besides being in violation of principles of natural justice besides directing not to proceed further. lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 1467 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings bearing No.ANU/Estt-NTS/Suspension/2010 dated 11.8.2010 issued by the respondents pending final disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J VS H SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.M.CHALAPATHI SC For Nagarjuna University The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 1206 of 2011 ORDER: Ms.V.Haritha, learned counsel representing Sri J.V.S.H.Sastry, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, requested further four weeks time to secure instructions and there is no response from the writ petitioner. Then this Court has suggested that the writ petition be dismissed for non-prosecution with a liberty to the petitioner to file an application for restoration. Learned counsel accepted for the said proposal. In view of accepting such representation made by this Court, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- J. SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri J. V. S. H. Sastry, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri M. Chalapathi, SC For Nagarjuna University [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP No.1206 OF 2011 5 17 mm ^ * Current Section r DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS