Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133005 (ALL)

PAWAN SINGH AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/3409/2025 · 2025-04-09

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19970-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3409 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pawan Singh And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishva Nath Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. It appears that the compensation claimed by the petitioners in respect of the land acquired on account of pendency of Suit No. 232 of 2021 in the court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)- II, Faizabad. Contention is that even though the temporary injunction application has been rejected, which has attained finality upto the appellate/revisional level, still the compensation is not being paid. These are matters to be considered purely by the Land Acquisition Officer. The petitioner may approach the said officer. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench