IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 TA-48-2025 Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 NISHA @ NISHA BHANDARI ....Applicant Versus GUJINDER SEHGAL .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the applicant. Mr. Sunil Mallan, Advocate for the respondent (Through video conferencing). ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the applicant, despite the case having been called twice. Even, on the last date of hearing, none had made appearance on behalf of the applicant. Prior to the last date also, counsel for applicant had not been making appearance off and on. Seemingly, the applicant is not interested in pursuing the transfer application. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARCHANA PURI) 09.09.2025 JUDGE Sonu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sonu 2025.09.10 10:16 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC