RAM MANOHAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. GRAMYA VIKAS LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/3452/2025 · 2025-04-16
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21733-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3452 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Manohar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Gramya Vikas Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suman Lata,Anita Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner has made some allegations against the existing Gram Pradhan. The petitioner should approach the District Magistrate as per the UP Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules 1997, if there is a cause. If any such complaint has been filed in terms of Rule 3 of UP Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules 1997, the District Magistrate should look into the matte and consider the same as per law, if such complaint is maintainable and there is no other legal impediment. We have not at all adjudicated the merits of the allegations made by the petitioner against the Gram Pradhan. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench