Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13296 (AP)

AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS PVT.LTD., v. THE ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED(APHC)

CRP/818/2024 · 2025-06-26

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010160472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE V PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 818 OF 2024 Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the order dated 02.02.2024 in lA No. 904 of 2023 in OS No. 41 OF 2019 on the file of the Hon’ble III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore. Between: AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS PVT.LTD., Post Box No. 1627, RP Road, Secunderabad - 500003 authorized signatory, Sri. T.R. Ganesh Aiyer 8571 Represented by its ...Petitioner AND THE ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED (APIIC), Having its office at, 59A-20/3/2A Floor, Sri Siva Complex, 1 St Teachers Colony, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh - 520 008. Represented by its Managing Director. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order and Decree in lA. No. 904 of 2023, the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore in O.S.No.41 of 2019. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Sri SANTHI CHANDRA, SC For APIIC The Court made the following order: / w APHC010160472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR aVIL REVISION PETITION NO: «1«/9n92i BEH [3505] r Between: Automotive Manufacturers Pvt.ltd. ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limitedaphc Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SANTHI CHANDRA SC For APIIC ...RESPONDENT The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANTREGISTRAR \ /F //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, Nellore District. 2. One CC to SRI VIMAL VARMA VASIREDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI SANTHI CHANDRA, Advocate, SC For APIIC [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies GPC NM '7'-. '¥ \ . \ \ \ ■ high court DATED; 27/06/2025 ORDER ORP NO. 818 OF 2024 || 2 5 SEP 2025 | Current seciion ^ "'“^PATCVA^?'" ii II I c» £ t i; (• dismissing this CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS I