Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13294 (RAJ)

SMT. LEELA W/O UDAI SINGH D/O RAMDHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1831/2020 · 2025-08-22

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33351] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1831/2020 Smt. Leela W/o Udai Singh D/o Ramdhan, aged about 24 years, R/o Kasara, Presently R/o Chari Ka Har, P.S. Sadar Karauli, Tahsil And Distt. Karauli (Raj.) ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Petitioner 2. Bhagat Ram S/o Jagram, aged about 51 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli. 3. Ramavtar S/o not known, aged about 43 years, R/o Meena Badoda, Police Station Peeloda, District Swai Madhopur. 4. Banwari S/o not known, aged about 46 years, R/o Beekampura, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. 5. Rambhan S/o not known, aged about 46 years, R/o Bheekampura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli. 6. Bhagwati S/o not known, Aged About 51 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. 7. Prem Singh S/o not known, aged about 41 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli. 8. Udai Singh S/o Jaylal, aged about 31 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli. 9. Mohan Singh S/o Ram Singh, aged about 34 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli. 10. Munshi S/o not known, aged about 29 years, R/o Bheekampura, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. 11. Surjeet S/o Halkey, aged about 33 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. 12. Puran S/o Chauthi, aged about 41 years, R/o Kasara, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. 13. Seva S/o not known, aged about 33 years, R/o Bheekampura, Police Station Langara, District Karuli. 14. Pintu S/o not known, aged about 31 years, R/o Bheekampura, Police Station Langara, District Karauli. [2025:RJ-JP:33351] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-1831/2020] 15. Dr. Kirodi Lal Meena S/o not known, aged about 63 years, R/o Khoharra, Police Station Salempur, District Dausa. ----Accused Non-petitioners/Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. with Mr. Lokendra Sharma, Adv. For Respondents : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 22/08/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 27.02.2020 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karauli (hereinafter referred to as learned 'Revisional Court') in Criminal Revision Petition No.79/2019 whereby learned Revisional Court dismissed the revision petition filed on behalf of the petitioner/complainant and affirmed the order dated 06.08.2019 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karauli (hereinafter referred to as learned 'trial Court') in Protest Petition. Vide the impugned order dated 06.08.2019, learned trial Court while dismissing the protest petition filed on behalf of the petitioner/complainant, accepted the negative final report submitted in FIR No.124/2016 registered at Mahila Thana, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376-D, 344 and 323 of IPC. 2. After investigation in the impugned FIR by Deputy Superintendent of Police and Additional Superintendent of Police, final report was submitted before concerned Magistrate discussing [2025:RJ-JP:33351] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-1831/2020] as many as 16 points which made the whole story of the prosecution doubtful and a negative final report was submitted. 3. Against the negative final report, the prosecutrix/complainant submitted a protest petition and vide the impugned order dated 06.08.2019, learned trial Court while dismissing the protest petition filed on behalf of the petitioner/complainant, accepted the negative final report in the impugned FIR. Against the impugned order dated 06.08.2019, Criminal Revision Petition No.79/2019 was filed by the petitioner/complainant and the same was dismissed by learned Revisional Court vide the detailed order dated 27.02.2020. 4. Aggrieved by the impugned orders dated 27.02.2020 and 06.08.2019 passed by the Courts below, the present petition has been filed. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant prays that the present petition be allowed and cognizance against the respondent Nos.2 to 15 be taken, by quashing the impugned orders dated 27.02.2020 and 06.08.2019 passed by the Courts below. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 7. After perusing the impugned FIR; the negative final report and the impugned orders dated 27.02.2020 and 06.08.2019 passed by the Courts below, this Court does not find any illegality or impropriety in the orders passed by the Courts below. Also, there is concurrent finding of learned trial Court as well as learned Revisional Court and there is no sufficient material available on which the findings of the Courts below can be interfered with. [2025:RJ-JP:33351] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-1831/2020] 8. In view of the aforesaid discussions, the present petition lacks merit and the same is dismissed having no force. 9. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /10