Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132938 (ALL)

JAGDISH PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/3862/2025 · 2025-04-11

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20728 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3862 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Shukla,Desh Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 & 2 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 & 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties no.5 & 6 are dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.4 to refix the pay scale (Consequential benefits) to the petitioner including the Selection Grade and time bound pay scale as Junior persons- opposite parties no.5 and 6 may be paid along with interest @ 18% per annum with a short and fixed period of time as specified by the Hon'ble Court." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 and this Court may direct opposite party no.4 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.4 i.e District Basic Education Officer, Gonda taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 11.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench