Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132924 (ALL)

PURUSHOTTAM YADAV @ PURUSHOTTAM SINGH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLA/1093/2025 · 2025-04-16

Alok Mathur

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21359 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1093 of 2025 Appellant :- Purushottam Yadav @ Purushottam Singh Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Sanjay Kumar Rao,Kanhaiya Lal Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for appellants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2. The present criminla appeal under Section 14 A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 4.11.2024 passed in Sessions Case No.2619/2024 (State Vs. Purushotam Singh Yadav and others) arising out of case crime No.437/2022, under Sections 420, 447, 120B, 504 and 506 IPC and 3(1) (Da) and 3(1) (Dha) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, relating to police station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for appellants, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021", to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellants, Purushottam Yadav @ Purushottam Singh Yadav and Rameshwar Yadav @ Rameshwar Prasad Yadav appear before the trial court within thirty days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). 5.The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 16.4.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench