Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13292 (GAU)

RANJIT DEY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/2972/2024 · 2025-02-18

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010114962024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2972/2024 RANJIT DEY SON OF LATE JAGANNATH DEY, PRESENT RESIDENT OF PALLA ROAD, NALBARI, P.O. NALBARI, P.S. NALBARI, DISTRICT- NALBARI, ASSAM, PIN CODE- 781335 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, P.O. ASSAM SACHIVALAYA, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN CODE- 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR P.O. ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM PIN CODE 781006 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI P.O. LACHITNAGAR P.S. PALTANBAZAR DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM PIN CODE- 781007 Page No.# 2/3 4:THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (A) ASSAM ASSAM POLICE HEAD QUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI P.O. LACHITNAGAR P.S. PALTANBAZAR DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM PIN CODE- 781007 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. DHUBRI P.S. DHUBRI DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN CODE- 78330 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K SINHA, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE DEPTT. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 19.02 .2025 Heard Mr. S.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. G. Bakalial, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5, Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the writ petitioner in respect of non-payment of outstanding dues, in the meantime have been released and the petitioner has received his outstanding dues during the pendency of the writ petition. Accordingly, on instructions the learned counsel for the petitioner submits Page No.# 3/3 that the writ petitioner does not wish to press the petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed, as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application is also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant