2025:JHHC:17889 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3473 of 2025 ----- Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Ram, S/o Baijnath Ram, R/o Village- Dhachabar, P.O.- Tisibar, P.S. Pandu, Dist- Palamu, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, AddI. P.P. …...... 04/ 04.07.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of under Sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 385, 386, 504, 506 of IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act. 3. The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. It is alleged that three persons, namely, Ritesh Ji, Ashish Ji and Deepak Ji obstructed construction work and handed over a note of zonal commander of banned organization to the guard of the construction company. They were demanding money. They covered the face and they threatened the construction supervisor, manager, workers. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been wrongly been shown as Ritesh Ji. He submits that there is nothing against the petitioner, which shows his involvement. 6. The allegation in the F.I.R. is of demand of levy by banned Maoist organization. It is alleged that three persons came and they were calling themselves Ritesh Ji, Ashish Ji and Deepak Ji. The petitioner claims himself Sushil Kumar. Thus, in the background, the identity of the petitioner needs to be established by the person, who had seen them. Thus, this is not only a case of custodial interrogation, but also the case of putting the petitioner in TIP. Thus, I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Thus, I am not inclined to entertain the anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in connection with Kandi P.S. Case No.15 of 2023, pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Garhwa, stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./