X TH FATHER AZAD ALI v. UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION DHARAMKUND RAMBAN AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/839/2025 · 2026-08-07
Ma Chowdhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1329 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1329 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 839/2025
X Th. Father Azad Ali
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
UT of J&K & Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, GA for R-1.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (07.08.2026)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today. So was the case on the last date of hearing as well.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that after investigation of the case registered & arising out of the impugned FIR, charge-sheet has been laid before the trial Court.
3. The absence on part of the petitioner suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition, any further in view of the development of filing of charge-sheet.
4. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution, alongwith connected application(s), if any.
5. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
07.08.2026
Ram Krishan
Serial No. 56 Regular List Ram Krishan 2026.08.10 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document