Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13289 (KAR)

SHRI. KRISHNA T v. BANK OF INDIA

WP/624/2021 · 2025-01-28

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3873 WP No. 624 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 624 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. KRISHNA.T S/O THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.635, 4TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, ROYAL COUNTRY, J.P.NAGAR, 8TH PHASE, BANGALORE-83. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH SHETTY.B., ADVOCATE) AND: BANK OF INDIA JP NAGAR BRANCH NO.2, 38TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS ROAD, JP NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BANGALORE-78. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVABASAVA.S.G., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3873 WP No. 624 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Sri.Jayaprakash Shetty.B., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Jayaprakash Shetty.B., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 38