BIPLAB KUMAR CHOWDHURY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
WPA/3951/2020 · 2025-09-03
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13288 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13288 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
03.09.2025. 17 Ct.No.7. tkm
WPA 3951 of 2020
Biplab Kumar Chowdhury Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudarsan Roy
Mr. Diptarka Majumder
... for North Dum Dum Municipality
1. Petitioner is unrepresented.
2. Mr. Majumder representing the respondent- municipality submits that upon receipt of the application from the petitioner under section 6 of the RTI Act, necessary information was supplied to the petitioner.
3. He produces a document issued by the concerned SPIO in support of such contention.
4. Document as produced by the respondent is taken on record.
5. In view of such submission made on behalf of the respondent-municipality I am of the view that no interference is warranted in this writ petition and the same is dismissed.
6. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)