Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13286 (UTT)

SHAMIM AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2388/2024 · 2025-02-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2388 of 2024 Shamim Ahmad …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Prem Kaushal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.01 of 2022, dated 13.01.2022, under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Bhatraujkhan, District Almora. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount; to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.02.2025 Sanjay