RAJESHA KUMARI GAUR THRU. POWER OF ATTORNEY ANUP KUMAR GAUR v. DIRECTOR U.P. RAJYA SAMPATTI NIDESHALAYA JAWAHAR BHAWAN LKO.
WRIA/4035/2025 · 2025-04-15
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20941 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4035 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesha Kumari Gaur Thru. Power Of Attorney Anup Kumar Gaur Respondent :- Director U.P. Rajya Sampatti Nideshalaya Jawahar Bhawan Lko. Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard the petitioner, who appeared in person, through Power of Attorney, and Ms. Deepshikha, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for the respondent. The petitioner submits that earlier a Writ-A No.10709/2024 Smt. Rajesha Kumari Gaur vs. Director, Directorate of State Property was filed before this Court, which was disposed of vide judgement and order dated 19.11.2024 directing the respondent (Director, U.P. Rajya Sampatti Nideshalaya, Lucknow) to decide the petitioner's representation dated
07.10.2024. He further submits that in due compliance of the aforesaid
judgment, representation of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that against the order dated 30.09.2024 passed in the succession suit number-224/2022 Smt. Ramdulari vs. Late Purnamasi submitted by Mrs. Rajesha Gaur, Civil Appeal No.- 320/2024 Smt. Ramdulari and another vs. Late Purnamasi has been filed by one Mr. Ashwani Kumar in the court of District Judge, Lucknow, which is pending. It is further submitted by the petitioner that Civil Appeal No.320 of 2024 has been decided finally now. He submits that aforesaid
Civil Appeal No.320 of 2024, Smt. Ram Dulari and another vs Late Poornmasi was rejected on 24.3.2025 and the order passed by the lower court in has been affirmed. It is next submitted that now ground taken by the respondent while rejecting the petitioner's representation is no more available to him. Thus, he prayed that the respondent may be
directed to pass a fresh order, to which learned standing counsel has no objection. In view of the above, without entering into merit of the case, the respondent is directed to take a decision in the case of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench