ANKUR ALIAS ANKUR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/3135/2025 · 2025-03-16
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37476 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3135 of 2025 Applicant :- Ankur Alias Ankur Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Brijesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 20.07.2015 and summoning order dated 14.08.2015 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 4723 of 2015, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S.- Mahila Thana, District- Ghaziabad arising out of Case Crime No. 116/2015, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Judicial Magistrate F.T.C.-1, Ghaziabad. 3. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 that dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature and now parties have settled their dispute amicably and written compromise dated 17.10.2024 has also been entered between them, copy of same has been annexed as Annexure 6 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that original deed of compromise has already been filed before the court below. A further request is made by both the parties that on the basis of compromise deed, this application may be dispose of. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 did not dispute the aforesaid fact. However, learned A.G.A. has submitted that the
aforesaid compromise is yet to be verified by the court below, therefore, a direction may be issued to court below to verify the aforesaid compromise. 5. In view of the above, present application is disposed of with direction to learned court below to verify the aforesaid compromise after summoning the parties and the court below may terminate the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified compromise in accordance with law. 6. It is further directed that the aforesaid exercise shall be concluded by the court below within a period of two months and for a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 7. However, the applicant is granted liberty to file a fresh application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the main proceedings, if need arises.
Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Sharad/- Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad