IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.315 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14804 of 2024 ====================================================== Lakhan Chaudhary Son of Late Hari Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Kutumba, P.S. Kutumba District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shreekant Shashtree, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad (Bihar). 3. Mr. Ashish Kumar Sinha, the Additional Collector (Lok Shikayat Nivaran), District Aurangabad-cum-First Appellate Authority, Aurangabad. 4. Mr. Vijyant, the Sub Divisional Officer, Aurangabad (Bihar). 5. Mr. Balwant Singh, the Circle Officer, Kutumba Anchal, District Aurangabad (Bihar). 6. Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, the S.H.O. Kutumba Police Station, District- Aurangabad. 7. Anil Tiwari Son of Lalan Tiwari, Resident of Village- Kutumba, P.S. Kutumba, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 8. Sunil Tiwari Son of Lalan Tiwari, Resident of Village- Kutumba, P.S. Kutumba, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Sunita Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binay Kumar, AC to SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 01-08-2025 Heard the parties. 2. In compliance with the order of this Court, a show- cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the O.P. Nos. 2-6. In the light of the order under contempt, the claim of the petitioner vis-a-vis private respondent was duly considered. It has been informed to this Court that notices were duly served to the Patna High Court MJC No.315 of 2025(4) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 petitioner of Parcha Cancellation Case No. 72 of 2022, namely, Anil Tiwari, but he failed to produce any relevant documents in support of his claim over the land, in question. 3. The Halka Revenue Karmchari has also submitted a report, after proper enquiry that the jamabandi of the land, in question, is standing in the name of the petitioner (Lakhan Chaudhary), as the petitioner of Parcha Cancellation Case No. 72 of 2022 failed to produce any document in support of his claim. Thus, the O.P. No. 5 has passed the order dated 30.11.2024, by which he recommended to keep the jamabandi of Lakhan Chaudhary as it is and further the record of miscellaneous proceeding has been sent to the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad for further action. 4. Considering the specific averments made in the show-cause affidavit filed on behalf of the O.P. Nos. 2-6, this Court does not find any reason or occasion to proceed further in the contempt proceeding. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding stands disposed off. shivank/- (Harish Kumar, J) U