JAI PRAKASH v. SRI VEER RATAN MOHAN THE REGIONAL MANAGER RBO-VII SULTANPUR
CAPL/1061/2025 · 2025-05-14
Rajeev Singh
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28231 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1061 of 2025 Applicant :- Jai Prakash Opposite Party :- Sri Veer Ratan Mohan The Regional Manager Rbo-Vii Sultanpur Counsel for Applicant :- Shrikant Mishra Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sharad Dwivedi, the learned counsel for respondent.
2. The present contempt application is filed with the following prayer :
"This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to punish Sri Veer Ratan Mohan, the Regional Manager (RBO-VII), State Bank of India, Civil Lines, Sultanpur, (U.P.)- 228001, for deliberately and intentionally not deciding the representation dated 08.10.2024, submitted by the petitioner, in compliance of the order dated 07/02/2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ A No.10204 of 2023 : Jai Prakash Vs. State Bank of India, through its Chairman, Central Office, Mumbai Maharashtra & 2 others, which are duly served upon the contemnor (which is filed as Annexure No.1 to the contempt petition."
3. Sri Sharad Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent filed counter affidavit duly sworn by Sri Veer Ratan Mohan, the Regional Manager (RBO-VII), State Bank of India, Civil Lines, Sultanpur, which is taken on record. Sri Sharad Dwivedi informed the Court that decision has already been taken on the representation of the applicant.
4. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the counter affidavit filed by the respondent it is evident that the decision has already been taken on the representation of the applicant by the respondent on 16.04.2025 therefore, this Court is of the view that no contempt is made out.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed. However, it is open to the applicant to take appropriate remedy, if he still feels aggrieved. Order Date :- 14.5.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench