Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13280 (UTT)

ASHUTOSH NAUTIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1359/2024 · 2025-03-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2114 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1359 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned D.A.G. with Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioners have challenged the FIR No.350 of 2024 dated 21.11.2024 registered with P.S. Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 and 506 IPC and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961. 4. It is contended by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed by the police on 20.03.2025 against the petitioners, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it becomes infructuous. 5. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, till the submission of charge-sheet before Court, the Investigating Agency is directed not to arrest the petitioners-Ashutosh Nautiyal, Smt. Anjali Nautiyal, Maya Ram Nautiyal and Smt. Kalpana Nautiyal. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.03.2025 PN