GHULAM MOHI-UD-DIN-NAJAR v. KHURSHEED AHMAD GANAIE
TrP (Crl)/21/2023 · 2025-09-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13280 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13280 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 06 Reg Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
TrP (Crl) 21/2023 CrlM (784/2023)
Ghulam Mohi-Ud-Din Najar
…Petitioner (s)
Through: Mr. B. S. Bali, Advocate
VERSUS
Khursheed Ahmad Ganie
Through:
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 02.09.2025
As per the report of the Registry, steps in terms of order dated 21st May, 2025 have not been taken by the petitioner. However, considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner that requisite steps have already been taken, the Registry is directed to verify whether any such steps have indeed been taken for effecting service upon the respondents by the petitioner. In the event, if it is found that the petitioner has not taken the requisite steps, the instant petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. List accordingly.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 02.09.2025 Showkat Khan