IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. No.63 of 2025 M/s.Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. .. Applicant vs Vijayapandian S .. Respondent ORDER Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the vehicle could not be located. 2.As seen from the earlier proceedings, sufficient time has been granted for the applicant to locate the vehicle to enable the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court to re-possess the vehicle. 3.Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for the very same relief, once the vehicle is located. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. vga 4.While considering the fresh application to be filed by the applicant in the near future, this Court will consider retaining the very same Commissioner appointed by this Court in this application as the applicant has already paid the Advocate Commissioner's initial remuneration of Rs.30,000/-. 18.02.2025 vga Arb.Appln. No.63 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis