Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18256 MFA No. 330 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2025 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI VIJAYKUMAR S/O. LATE RAMANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
2.
SRI KARTHIK KUMAR S/O. LATE RAMANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
3.
SMT. MAHADEVAMMA W/O. BALAKRISHNA D/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KONAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK - 561 205.
4.
SRI MANJUNATH S/O. DODDAMUNISHAMAPPA, AKKAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT KUDUREGERE, JALA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 562 162. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAJENDRA S.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NANDISH GOWDA G B., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18256 MFA No. 330 of 2025
AND:
1.
SRI RAJANNA S/O. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KONAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK - 561 205.
2.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB, OFFICE-2, (BMICP), NO.14/3, CFC BUILDING, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVANA, 1ST FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA RAOD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MURALIDHAR B.N., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED ON I.A. IN OS.NO.495/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:18256 MFA No. 330 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL JUDGMENT
Sri. Rajendran S.S.,
learned counsel appearing for Sri. Nandish Gowda G.B., learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled the matter amicably as such the appeal has become infructuous. He files a memo which reads as under,
"The Appellants in the above case pray this Hon'ble Court be pleased to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed, since suit filed by the appellants before the trial is dismissed as withdrawn not pressed by the
order dated 8/4/2025. Therefore, under the circumstances, the above appeal will become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Memo is signed by appellant No.4-Sri Manjunath by himself and on behalf of the other appellants.
3. Memo is taken on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE
CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 100