SAURABH GARG S/O RATAN LAL GARG v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4674/2025 · 2025-04-03
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13274 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13274 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4674/2025
1. Saurabh Garg S/o Ratan Lal Garg, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 87, Pansari Mohalla, Ward No. 15, Paota, Kotputli-Behror (Raj.).
2. Ravi Rathore S/o Mohan Lal Rathore, Aged About 40 Years, R/o H. No. 614-A, New Railway Colony, Kota Junction, Kota (Raj.).
3. Vikky Sharma S/o Vijay Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Jain Temple, Govindgarh, Chomu, Jaipur (Raj.).
4. Neha Mandawaria D/o Ram Sahai Mandawaria, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Indraprasth Colony, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. Ritu Sharma D/o Madan Lal Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Opposite Munsif Court, Kishan Colony, Narayanpur Road, Bansur, Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Bodies, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, G-3, Department Of Local Bodies, Rajmahal Residencial Area, C-Scheme Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur-16, Rajasthan.
3. Davendra Singh Sagar S/o Sher Singh Sagar, Aged About 42 Years, Presently Posted At Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Rakesh Sharma S/o Late Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, Presently Posted At Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
(2 of 2) [CW-4674/2025] Order 03/04/2025
1. Matter pertains to promotion. The petitioners have alternative statutory remedy of filing appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, but without availing the remedy before the Tribunal, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition.
2. It is settled proposition of law that whenever alternative efficacious statutory remedy is available to a person, he cannot be allowed to bypass the jurisdiction of Appellate Authority.
3. In view of the above, instant petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority by way of filing an appeal.
4. In case, any appeal is submitted by the petitioners before the Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today, the Appellate Authority is expected to hear and decide the same on its merits after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties, expeditiously as early as possible, ignoring the period of limitation.
5. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/18