S. No. 10 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 880/2025 CM(2303/2025) MOHD SAFDAR JOO AND OTHERS. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmad Mir, Adv. Mr. Nayeem, Adv. Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 28.04.2025 After arguing for a while when learned counsel for the petitioners was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition which involved disputed question of fact, the learned counsel submits that he has already filed a representation before respondent No. 6 for carrying out the demarcation of land in question. The learned counsel has drawn the attention of this court to the representation alleged to have been filed by him before the concerned Tehsildar way back on 25.11.2024, which till date has not been accorded due consideration and he further submits that he would feel satisfied in case a direction is issued to the said respondent to accord consideration to the said representation within some reasonable time to which on asking of the court Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Dy. AG, has caused appearance on behalf of respondents 1 to 8, has no objection. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal at the very threshold and it is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 6 to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner which has been placed on record as Annexure 7, with this petition within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order along with the writ petition is made available to the respondent No. 6 strictly under rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. The writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 28.04.2025 Sakeena