RAJNATH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A483/307/2025 · 2025-04-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21341 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 307 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajnath Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava,Raj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to opposite party nos. 2 and 3, is dispensed with.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant by means of present application has prayed for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 1824 of 2016 - Rajnath Pandey Vs. Rajendra Prasad and Another, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station - Kotwali Akbarpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ambedkar Nagar.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant moved an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for lodging first information report against opposite party nos. 2 and 3 on
07.04.2016. The trial Court registered the case s Misc. Case No. 246 of 2016 on 12.04.2016, and called for report from the concerned Police Station. the trial Court by means of order dated 24.05.2016, treated the application as complaint case being Complaint Case No. 1824 of 2016. Subsequently statements under Section 200 Cr.P.C. of the applicant was recorded. Since then the proceedings of the said case are pending and till date the matter has not been concluded. It is prayed that in the interest of justice, learned Court below may be directed to conclude the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1824 of 2016, expeditiously.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by the applicant.
6. In view of above, learned trial Court is directed to make every endeavour to conclude and decide the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1824 of 2016 - Rajnath Pandey Vs. Rajendra Prasad and Another, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C.,
Police Station - Kotwali Akbarpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, expeditiously, in accordance with law.
7. With the above directions, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench