Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132715 (ALL)

VASDEO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/3413/2025 · 2025-04-16

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21257-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3413 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vasdeo Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. This is a backlog fresh which has been listed three times earlier. Today illness slip has been sent by Shri Rahul Roshan Dubey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Considering the grievance, the petitioner, if he has a cause, may approach the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Learned Standing Counsel has instructions to state that the demarcation had actually taken place and pillars were installed, but the petitioner was not happy, therefore, the said exercise was conducted again, and ultimately in that process, it was found that the area of the Gata which was to be demarcated was more in the map viz-a-viz the area mentioned in the Khatauni, therefore, the remedy now is to get the map corrected. The petitioner may avail remedies as may be prescribed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench