Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. Nos.57 & 58 of 2025 Sunray Scans, rep. by its Authorised Partner Dr.A.Subair Khan .. Applicant vs UHealth India Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
ORDER The Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has already re-possessed the equipment, morefully described in the schedule to the judges summons from the respondent on 17.02.2025. 2.Mr.B.A.Prakash, learned counsel undertook to file vakalat on behalf of the respondent. Till date, he has not filed vakalat on behalf of the respondent. Therefore, it is clear that the respondent is not interested in defending this application. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J. vga 3.Since the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has already re- possessed the equipment from the respondent and since the respondent has chosen not to enter appearance in these applications despite service of notice, no useful purpose will be served by keeping these applications pending. 4.After recording the fact that the applicant has already re-possessed the equipment by the Advocate Commissioner and by making the respondent exparte, these applications are closed. 17.03.2025 vga Arb.Appln. Nos.57 & 58 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis