Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13271 (AP)

TALAMARA RAMANJINEYULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/3377/2025 · 2025-04-04

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I \._-.-= [3369] IN THE H[GH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI `..r€:.-S:i, FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: :qE=%=_%.i=.#=;:= THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO'es+RE CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3377 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Talamara Ramanjineyulu, (A1) S/o. Late Gangappa, Aged about 66 years. 2. Talamara Tanojkumar, (A2), S/o. Ramanjineyulu, Aged about 30 years. 3. Shivasankar@Siva kumar,(A3), S/o. Ramanjineyulu, Aged about 35 years. 4. Talamara Ramesh, (A4), S/o. Ramanjineyulu, Aged about 49 years. 5. Jayamma, (A6), W/o. Ramesh, Aged about 42 years. 6. Muddamma, (A7), W/o. Ramanjineyulu, Aged about 59 years. All are Residents of Old SC, Colony MadakasiraTownSriSatyaSaiDistrl'ct.) PetI-tiOnerS/Accused 1 to 4, 6 & 7 AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravathi. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased \to release the petitioners /Al to A4 &A6 & A7 on bail in connection with crime No. 38 of 2025 on the file of Madakaisra PS, Srl' Sathya Sal' District COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRl. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT .-PUBLIC PROSECUTOR // APHCO10159942025 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3377/2025 Between : Talamara Ramanjineyulu and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Ibg£gEJ±ade±bLe fOIlowi nq Order: This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioners herein/accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 seeking regular bail, in Crime No.38 of 2025 of MadakaSira Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1) and 118(1) read with 190 of the BNS. 2. Case of the Prosecution, in brief iS that this iS a Case Of attempt to murder and voluntarily causing hurt that occurred on o9.03.2025 at about 09.15 p.m. in front of the accused house, wherein all the accused formed into a unlawful assembly holding deadly weapons Sticks and Stones and Picked uP altercation with the injured K.P.Prasad by ±€eePing Previous grudges in their .-----=--. // I? minds, due to site dispute between the injured and accused families, they picked up quarrel with them and the accused armed with sticks and beat on the head of the injured with an intent to murder and caused bleeding injur'les. Hence, the Present complaint. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners Submits that based On the same inc®ldent held on o9.03.2025, Al in the Present Crime gave a report against the defacto complainant and others. He further submits that after completion of investigation in the present crime, charge sheet is f®lled. Moreover, the injured Was discharged from the hospital. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. Considering the Subm'ISSiOnS made and in View Of the fact that investigat'lon in the present crime is completed and the injured in the present crime was discharged from the hospital, any further detention of the petitioner is not required and hence, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petit-loners herein/accused Nos.1 to4,6and7. . of--Fit \ T| 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioners herein/accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 shall be released on bail on each of them 6xecuting a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2O,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each With two sureties of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madakasira. The petitioners herein shall co-operate with the trial of the case. A ^ /ITRUE COPY// SD/- K.SFilN!VASA RAJU ASSISTANT TEAR _,=±=-A Fc To, 1. The Judicial Magistrate Of First Class, Madakasira 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, HinduPur 3. The Station House officer, MadakaiSra PS, Sri Sathya Sai District 4. One CC to SRl. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P[OUT] 6. One spare copy If E= HIGH COURT TMR,J DATE D.. 04/04/2O25 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.3377 of 2025 ALLOWED a,,:I : '- l u®& hpR Life