- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15702 WP NO.736 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.736 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. MEHABOOB PASHA S/O LATE KHADAR SAB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT VAIJAKURU VILLAGE, KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 563 128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIREESHA KODGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRARTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 002. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, TUBAGERE - DODDABALLAPURA ROAD, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15702 WP NO.736 OF 2022 4. THASILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. 5. THE DEPUTY THASILDAR DEPUTY THASILDAR OFFICE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 560 067. 6. SHEK KHADAR SAB SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. 6(a). Y.K. BASHA S/O LATE KHADAR SAB AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 6(b). MEHABOOB PASHA S/O Y.K. BASHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 6(c). NAGEEN TAJ D/O Y.K. BASHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 6(d). GULLUMATAJ D/O Y.K. BASHA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 6(e). SHIREEN D/O Y.K. BASHA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. 6(f). PEER PASHA S/O Y.K. BASHA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. 6(g). JAINANI D/O KHADAR SAB AGE: MAJOR R/AT SULIBELE, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15702 WP NO.736 OF 2022 NADAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK. 6(h). NANEEMA D/O LATE KHADER SAB AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT YELAHANKA, ITTIGE FACTORY, BENGALURU. 6(i). KHALEEL PASHA S/O LATE MAIDEEN PASHA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. 6(j). ROSHAN S/O LATE MAIDEEN PASHA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 6(i) and 6(j) ARE R/AT YELACHAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK. 6(k). SHAHENA D/O LATE KADAR SAB AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT AZAD NAGAR, KOLAR. 6(l). GORIMA D/O LATE KADAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT AZAD NAGAR, KOLAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. DIWAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6(a) TO R6(l)) - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:15702 WP NO.736 OF 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 25.10.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN REVISION PETITION NO.220/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-AB AND THE CORRIGENDUM DATED 29.10.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-AC; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner herein himself had filed memo dated 23.09.2023, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under: "MEMO OF THE PETITIONER The Petitioner above named hereby produces the reported judgment reported in Writ Petition No.6872/2013 (KLR) - The revenue authorities viz., the Tahsildar, Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner have no jurisdiction to decide the title dispute between the parties in respect of the immovable property/properties. It is the exclusive domain of the competent Civil Court to adjudicate the dispute/title in respect of the immovable property/properties and ultimately if any decree to be passed by the competent Civil Court will be binding on the parties as well as the - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:15702 WP NO.736 OF 2022 revenue authorities in the State for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court and for deciding the Memo of the Petitioner for withdrawal of the petition as such order may be passed accordingly in the above case, in the interest of justice." 2. In the light of the aforesaid memo, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34