Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132632 (ALL)

SHIVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DISTRICT LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/3180/2025 · 2025-04-15

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21094 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3180 of 2025 Applicant :- Shivendra Singh Chauhan And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home District Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanat Singh,Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Sri Arshad Jameel, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Arshad Jameel, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceeding of Case Crime No.281 of 2023, under Sections 409, 420 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Aliganj, District Lucknow pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Court No.28, Lucknow. 4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the respondent no.2 lodged an F.I.R. against the applicants which was registered as Case Crime No.281 of 2023, under Sections 409, 420 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Aliganj, District Lucknow. It is contended that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and entered into a compromise, and the applicants have filed Application U/S 482 No.11298 of 2024 before this Court for quashing the entire proceedings against the applicants on the basis of said compromise, and this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024 disposed off the said application directing the parties to appear before the Court below for verification of the compromise. 5. He submits that in pursuance of the said order, both the parties appeared before the Court below, on which the learned Magistrate verified the compromise deed entered into between the parties vide order dated 29.01.2025, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the present application. Hence, it is submitted that the proceeding against the applicants be quashed. 6. Sri Arshad Jameel, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has admitted the fact of the compromise. 7. Accordingly, the present Application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is disposed off in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 8. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the proceedings of Case Crime No.281 of 2023, under Sections 409, 420 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Aliganj, District Lucknow is quashed. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 S.Sharma Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench