[2025:RJ-JP:35626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7438/2009 Management Committee, Saini Shiksha Samiti, Manu Marg, Alwar, Through Its Secretary ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 2. The Deputy Director (Male), Education Department, Jaipur Division, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Smt. Suman Lata Saini W/o Shri Surendra Singh, resident of 237, Subhash Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan 4. Saini Senior Secondary School, Manu Marg, Alwar, Through Its Principal 5. Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur Through Its Presiding Officer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2048/2008 The Management Committee, Saini Shiksha Samiti, Manu Marg, Alwar, Through Its Secretary ----Petitioner-Non-Applicant Versus 1. The Civil Judge (J. D.) & Judicial Magistrate No.1, Alwar ----Respondent 2. Smt. Sumanlata Saini W/o Shri Surendra Singh, R/o 237, Subhash Nagar, Alwar Respondent-Applicant For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhavya Kala for Mr. Devansh Sharma, DGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 04/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:35626] (2 of 2) [CW-7438/2009] On last date when the case reached hearing, i.e., 05.09.2024, this Court passed the following order:- “Counsel for the respondents submits that the application filed by the respondents under Section 21 of the Rajasthan Non-Government Education Institution Act, 1989 (for short, ‘the Act of 1989’) was allowed by the Tribunal vide order dated 09.02.2004 and the petitioner has been directed to pay the benefit of revised pay scale to the respondents. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order has been challenged by the petitioner by way of filing of this petition and on 03.07.2009, an ex parte interim order has been passed. Counsel submits that because of the aforesaid ex parte order, the respondents are not in a position to receive the benefit of revised pay scale and this petition is pending before this Court since last two decades and the same requires urgent hearing. List after one week. In case, the counsel for the petitioner fails to appear before this Court on the next date then appropriate orders would be passed.” Today also, none appears for the petitioner even in the second round. In view thereof, these civil writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/139-140