HARI KISHAN v. SHRI ANAND PRAKASH RAI NAIB TEHSILDAR TEHSIL MILKIPUR DISTRICT AYODHYA
CAPL/1028/2025 · 2025-05-14
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132610 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132610 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28263 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1028 of 2025 Applicant :- Hari Kishan Opposite Party :- Shri Anand Prakash Rai Naib Tehsildar Tehsil Milkipur District Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhakar Tiwari Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Case called out. No one has appeared for the applicant.
2. Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent is present.
3. The present contempt application is filed with the following prayer :
"This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to summon the opposite party/contemnor to appear in person before this Hon'ble Court and punish him in accordance with law for commission of gross, deliberate and willful disobedience of this Hon'ble Court's order by flouting the order dated 27.05.2024 passed in A- 227 No.2602 of 2024 (Hari Kishan Versus Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, district Ayodhya and Others), contained as Annexure No.01."
4. Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent filed before this Court affidavit of compliance duly sworn by Sri Anand Prakash Rai, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, district Ayodhya, which is taken on record. Learned Counsel for respondent informed the Court that pursuant to the
order of the writ Court, the case in question i.e. Case No.3086 of 2023 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided by the respondent on 11.04.2025. He further submitted that the order of the writ court has been complied with.
5. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the order passed by the respondent authority dated 11.04.2025, this Court is of the view that since the decision has been taken by the respondent authority therefore, the present contempt application has lost its efficacy.
6. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench