Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13261 (PNJ)

DHIAN CHAND v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CWP/1185/2025 · 2025-02-07

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 109 Dhian Chand State of Punjab CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. Pra promote the pet category. 2. Lea present petition served, howeve instructions, pra same in a time b the limited praye 3. In v case, this petitio decide the legal 07.02.2025 ashok Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-118 Date of de Versus unjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for t Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, P *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition he petitioner as Superintendent Grade Learned counsel submits that rega etition, a legal notice dated 23.10. owever, the same has yet not evo ns, prays that a direction may be given time bound manner, to which learned d prayer made. In view of the above and without co petition is hereby disposed of with legal notice dated 23.10.2024, expedi ( A Whether speaking/reasoned : Ye Whether reportable : Ye NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 1185-2025 (O&M) te of decision: 07.02.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY for the petitioner. AG, Punjab. etition is for directing the respondents Grade-II against the vacant post of S at regarding the claim as raised in th 3.10.2024, Annexure P-12, has bee t evoked any response. He thus, o given to the respondents to decide th earned State counsel has no objection hout commenting upon the merits of th with a direction to the respondents expeditiously, in accordance with law ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No dents to st of SC d in the as been hus, on cide the ction to ts of the s to h law. ASHOK KUMAR 2025.02.07 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document