Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132609 (ALL)

SMT. ARCHANA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/3408/2025 · 2025-04-11

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20785-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3408 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Archana Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Sultanpur And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla,Gaurav Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Shri Mishra, has instructions from the Police that there was information about altercation between private parties who have been 'challaned', apart from it, the Police is not interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to the land in question. Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that the person who is said to have informed the Police is not even recorded in the revenue records. Be that as it may, if there is a private dispute pertaining to the land, the parties should take recourse to the procedures prescribed in law. The police officials can interfere in such matters only if there is a law and order problem, apprehension of breach of peace, apprehension of commission of any crime or it has actually been committed or there is order of any court to be complied or there are other valid grounds in any law/statue for their interference. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench