APHC010159612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8349 OF 2025 Between: Shaik Baji Shaheed, S/o. Jaffer, aged 52 years, R/o. Ameenabad Village, Phirangipuram Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, presently residing at Flat No. 501, Brindavan Gardens, White House Apartments, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings at Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Station House Officer, Nallapadu Police Station, Nallapadu, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. Rathamsetti Seetharamanjaneyulu @ Lalapuram Ramu, S/o. not known to the petitioner, aged major, R/o. Lalapuram, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Shaik Rahim Baig, S/o. Ahmed Baig, aged major, R/o. Ameenabad Village, Phirangipuram Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Doddakula Padbhanabhudu, S/o. not known to the petitoner, aged major, R/o. H. No. 58-6-680, Ward No. 16, 2nd Lane, Maruthi Nagar, Old Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order of Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent in not conducting investigation in Crime No. 1140/2023 dated 30.11.2023 on the file of the 3rd respondent police station is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the further investigation into the case and consider the complaint/report dated 23.09.2024 made to thej-nd established by law. r respondent by following the procedure lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the further investigation into the case and consider the complaint/report dated 23.09.2024 made to the 2nd respondent by following the procedure established by law pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI,V.SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.4 to 6: -— The Court made the following order: APHC010159612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 8349/2025 Between: 1.SHAIK BAJI SHAHEED, S/O.JAFFER, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O.AMEENABAD VILLAGE, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 501, BRINDAVAN GARDENS, WHITE HOUSE APARTMENTS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.RATHAMSETTI SEETHARAMANJANEYULU LALAPURAM RAMU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, R/0. LALAPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.SHAIK RAHIM BAIG, S/O.AHMED BAIG, AGED MAJOR, R/0. AMEENABAD VILLAGE, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.DODDAKULA PADBHANABHUDU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITONER, AGED MAJOR. R/O. H. NO.58-6-680, WARD N0.16, 2ND LANE, MARUTHI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order of Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 more Particularly 3^^. respondent in not conducting investigation in Crime No^1140/2023 dated 30.11.2023 on the file of the 3rd respondent police station is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to the further investigation into the conduct . . . case and consider the complaint/report respondent by following the procedure established by law and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VSAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: (- ^ Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3 respondent in not conducting investigation in Crime No imo/2023 dated 30.11.2023 on the file of tul 3rd reVldent Ste Station IS Illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 19 of the consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to conduct daironoron?"”? “roplaintfreport dated 23.09.2024 made to the 2"^* respondent by following the established by law and to pass ..." 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner made a complaint/report dated 23.09.2024 to respondent No.3 which a case procedure was registered as the offence Learned counsel would submit that till date, investigation is not yet completed and prays that necessary direction may be given to the respondent Police and dispose of Writ Petition. in Crime No. 1140 of 2023 of Nallapadu Police Station for punishable under Section 341, 324 and 506 read with 34 IPC. this 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, it is apposite to direct respondent Police to conclude the investigation with regard to Crime No. 1140 of 2023 on the file of respondent No.3 and file final report before the concerned Trial Court as expeditiously as possible. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR Pending applications, if any, shall stan4 closed. // ^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings at Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Officer, Nallapadu Police Station, Nallapadu, Guntur 2. The 3. The Station House District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. Rathamsetti Seetharamanjaneyulu Lalapuram Ramu, S/o. not known to Lalapuram, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra the petitioner, aged major, R/o. Pradesh. 5. Shaik Rahim Baig, S/o. Ahmed Baig, aged major, R/o. Ameenabad Village, Phirangipuram Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Padbhanabhudu, S/o. not known to the petitioner, aged major. 6. Doddakula R/o, H, No. 58-6-680, Ward No. 16, 2nd Lane, Maruthi Nagar, Old Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. One CC to SRI. V SAI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Two CCs to 9. Two CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:24/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 8349 OF 2025 ^ofano«^% Iio 16 SEP 2025 m Co/ * Curreni Section . X- DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS