Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132597 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR v. SATISH CHAND

WRIA/1000011/1997 · 2025-09-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1000011 of 1997 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. I.A. No.24 of 2023 -Application for recall 1. An application has been filed seeking recall of the order dated 19.07.2023. 2. Cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 3. Order dated 19.07.2023 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original file and number. Order on main petition 5. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has vacated the premises in question, as such, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. 6. The petition is accordingly dismissed in view of the statement made by the petitioner. September 16, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Singh, Samarth Saxena, Shafiq Mirza, Shishir Chandra, Upendra Kumar, Vishnu Pratap Singh, Vishwesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Avadesh Kumar, Dhruv Mathur, Dr.L.P.Mishra, I.D.Shukla, Ishwar Dutt Shukla, S K.Mehrotra, Santosh Kumar Mehrotra, Sushil Kumar Rastogi (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Satish Chand .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench