HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24404 of 2020 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Vivek Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mohd. Asif Khan, the learned AGA-I. 2. By means of the instant petitioner filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of certain judicial orders passed by the leaned Sessions Judge, Sultanpur and Judicial Magistrate Court No.23, Sultanpur. 3. Learned AGA-I has raised a preliminary objection that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Neeta Singh & Ors. v. The State of U.P. & Ors. in SLP (Criminal) No.13578 of 2024 and Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharasthra & Anr.; (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1948, the writ petition filed challenging validity of judicial orders is not maintainable. 4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant writ petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with the law. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed leaving the aforesaid liberty open for the petitioner. 6. Let certified copies of the orders annexed with the writ petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. September 17, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pathak, Vijay Pathak, Vinay Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ashish Kumar Rastogi, Mukesh Kumar Pandey (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Jagdishwar Bajpayee And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench