Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13258 (PNJ)

VAVINDER MAHAJAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1208/2025 · 2025-05-29

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-8191-CWP CWP-1208- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (165) Vavinder Mahajan State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI CM-8191-CWP allowed, for the good and valid reasons assigned therein. preponed from CWP-1208- 1. grant the asked for relief, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with to approach the apt authority/Forum con as sought through the instant writ petition. CWP-2025 in/and -2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mahajan Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate Mr. Subhash Chand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4-CBI. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) CWP-2025 Application for preponement of hearing of the main case allowed, for the good and valid reasons assigned therein. preponed from 09.07.2025, and is taken on board today itself. Application stands disposed of -2025 After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the asked for relief, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with approach the apt authority/Forum concerned, for redressal of his grievance, as sought through the instant writ petition. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-8191-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-1208-2025 Date of Decision : 29.05.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate and Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate Application for preponement of hearing of the main case, allowed, for the good and valid reasons assigned therein. Main case is 09.07.2025, and is taken on board today itself. disposed of accordingly. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the asked for relief, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty cerned, for redressal of his grievance, is Main case is After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant the asked for relief, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the liberty cerned, for redressal of his grievance, MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CM-8191-CWP CWP-1208- 2. withdrawn, with the liberty as aforesaid. May 29, 2025 Manpreet CWP-2025 in/and -2025 Consequently, the instant writ petition is , with the liberty as aforesaid. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ismissed as MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment