Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132564 (ALL)

TILAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/3372/2025 · 2025-04-08

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19795-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3372 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tilak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hairdaya Narain Tiwari,Ankit Kumar Pandey,Atul Tiwari,Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. The list of fresh cases has been revised. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the opposite parties no. 4 & 5 is taken on record. Heard. The petitioner claims that Rs. 9000/- payable as compensation for the well and boring which existed on the land that was acquired, as also, valuation / compensation pertaining to the trees which were existing thereon, especially in view of the communication dated 07.07.2023 of the opposite party no. 3, has not been paid, though, the award was rendered way back in the year 2008. The petitioner may move an application before the opposite party no. 3 who shall get the facts verified and do the needful, as per law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench