Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132563 (ALL)

RITESH KUMAR SHARMA v. SECRETARY , U.P. SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION COMMISSION LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

WRIA/3763/2025 · 2025-04-08

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19659 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3763 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ritesh Kumar Sharma Respondent :- Secretary , U.P. Subordinate Service Selection Commission Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mool Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, Advocate, who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1, which is taken on record. 2. The petitioner, through this petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to correct the selection-cum-seniority list of the petitioner on the basis of 66.5 marks, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party no.1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 8.7.2024 contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. (iv) Allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the petitioner." 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent that the representation of the petitioner dated 8.7.2024, which is on record as Annexure-1, may be directed to be decided by respondent no.2. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. 5. Considering the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to respondent no.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Rajya Kar, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent no.2 shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench