HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2568/2025 CM(6813/2025). FAROOQ AHMAD DAR AND ORS. …Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Syed Shabana, Advocate. VERSUS UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMR/SECRETARY. Through: None. …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 17.10.2025 01. The three petitioners are coming forward with similar purported causes of action although none of them has individually produced any single contract allotment order, as such, the petitioners cannot succeed in this manner in the present writ petition. 02. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed with liberty reserved in favour of each individual writ petitioner to 85 Suppl-1 come forward with the individual writ petition detailing the facts as to how the work order for the alleged contract work came to be allotted in its/his favour, how much work was done and how the so-called liability claimed accrued upon having executed the said work relating to each individual petitioner. 03. Joinder of the parties as well as causes of action in this writ petition would seriously prejudice the effective adjudication of this writ petition as such, dismissed with liberty granted. (Rahul Bharti) Judge SRINAGAR 17.10.2025 Bisma Jan.