Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132498 (ALL)

JAMEER AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TESHIL SADAR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER

A227/1936/2025 · 2025-04-08

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19718 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1936 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jameer Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Teshil Sadar, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner says some necessary parties are left to be impleaded in this petition, as such, he may be permitted to implead the same in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. The prayer aforesaid is acceded, as the same has not been opposed. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the aforesaid parties in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "i. That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct to the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate Ayodhya, Dist.-Ayodhya to expedite the case no. RST/7016/2022 (Computerized Case No. T202204230107016) under section 33/39 U.P. Land Revenue Act 1901 in the name of State Vs. Mohmmad Shuhail Azad Shiddiqi and others pending since 18/07/2022." It is submitted that for the reasons beyond control of the petitioner, the proceedings, in issue, have yet not been concluded, though, the same are pending since July, 2022 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, who is senior citizen aged about 62 years, is suffering great hardship and mental agony. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Sub-Divisional Magistrate Ayodhya, District- Ayodhya to conclude the proceedings in issue, indicated in prayer clause of this petition quoted above, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench