NITIN MOURYA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/3001/2025 · 2025-08-06
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46769 Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3001 of 2025 Applicant :- Nitin Mourya And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shikhar Deep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vipin Kumar Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Shikhar Deep Singh, learned counsel for applicants as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the chargesheet No. 01 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur, and the summoning order dated 18.01.2025 in Case No. 413 of 2025, State v. Rampal Maurya & ors., arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0238/2023 under Sections 147, 307, 323, 504, 506, 498-A, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur, on the basis of compromise, so far it relates to the present petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that it is a case of no-injury. He further states that in compliance of the order dated 08.04.2025 passed by this Court the applicants filed compromise deed before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balrampur, and the concerned court vide its order dated 22.04.2025 verified the said compromise in the presence of the applicants and opposite party no.2, copy of which is annexed as Annexure- 2 to the supplementary-affidavit filed by the petitioners. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the trial court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further. 5. Sri Vipin Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, is also present. He has no objection to the statement, made above. In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of
justice that the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed. 6. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the statement/compromise made by the applicants as well as opposite party no.2.
The entire proceedings of chargesheet No. 01 of 2024 dated 12.04.2024 under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur, and the summoning order dated 18.01.2025 in Case No. 413 of 2025, State v. Rampal Maurya & ors., arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0238/2023 under Sections 147, 307, 323, 504, 506, 498-A, I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur, as also the entire proceeding of the said case is hereby quashed, so far as it relates to the applicants herein. 7. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad or certified copy issued from the Registry of the High Court, Allahabad. 8. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 6.8.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench