Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-4057 114 (9) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Hukam Singh and ors. XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr.
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr.
order of even date.
30.10.2025 sanjay
4057-2003 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
***** RFA Date of Decision: 30.10.2025 Hukam Singh and ors.
Versus XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate
Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for the landowner(s).
Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana.
--- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For order, see RFA-3468- XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr.
order of even date. 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether Reportable?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-4057-2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.10.2025
…….Appellants Versus XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr.
.….Respondents JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. -2003, titled as Raj Kumar Vs. XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr., decided vide
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Yes/No Raj Kumar Vs. , decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2025.11.04 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document