Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132467 (PNJ)

HUKAM SINGH AND ORS v. XEN PWD B&R BRANCH Y NAGAR

RFA/4057/2003 · 2025-10-30

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-4057 114 (9) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Hukam Singh and ors. XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr. CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr. order of even date. 30.10.2025 sanjay 4057-2003 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 30.10.2025 Hukam Singh and ors. Versus XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for the landowner(s). Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For order, see RFA-3468- XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr. order of even date. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-4057-2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.10.2025 …….Appellants Versus XEN, PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr. .….Respondents JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. -2003, titled as Raj Kumar Vs. XEN PWD B&R Branch, Yamuna Nagar and anr., decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Raj Kumar Vs. , decided vide (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2025.11.04 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document