Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 132456 (ALL)

ANAND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF U.P. FOREST LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/3716/2025 · 2025-04-09

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19958 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3716 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of U.P. Forest Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Chandra Verma,Manvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Girish Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ram Kumar Misra, and learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and Sri Rishabh Tripathi for opposite parties no. 2 to 6. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief : "i. Issue a writ under or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to regularize the service of the petitioner as per Rules of 2016 on Class-IV post. ii. Issue a writ under or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the salary to the petitioner in regular scale of pay i.e. Rs. 18000-50000/- in grade pay of the Rs. 1800 payable to regular class -IV employee. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Managing Director, U.P. Forest Corporation, U.P., Lucknow taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 9.4.2025/Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench