LALJI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3306/2025 · 2025-04-11
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132444 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132444 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20496-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3306 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lalji And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Shankar Singh,Reshma Khatoon Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The period for which the permission had been granted by the S.O.C. for the petitioner to undertake construction has expired, a fact which is not in dispute. Therefore, if the petitioner has a ground, can move a fresh application before the S.O.C., unless there is any legal impediment, provided the consolidation operations are still pending. If such an application is moved, the same shall be considered accordingly. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench