IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.169 of 2024 Decided on 03rd March 2025 Virender Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Parav Sharma and Rahul Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in light of the judgment of this Court, the Authority has passed the appropriate order on 25.11.2024 and the case of the petitioner stands rejected on the ground that even on 26.06.2018, the family income was more than the income ceiling prescribed in the policy relating to the appointment on compassionate basis. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the said development, these proceedings be closed, but 2 with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order passed by the Authority in accordance with law, if so advised. 3. In view of the above, the proceedings are closed with liberty, as prayed for. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 03, 2025 (Vinod)