ARYAN MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND ORS.
WPIL/321/2025 · 2025-04-07
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 132437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19267-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 321 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aryan Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivam Shukla,Prabhat Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Before rushing to this Court by filing the present writ petition in public interest seeking a writ of mandamus, the petitioner appears to have made no effort to approach the competent authority i.e. Municipal Corporation, Lucknow for looking into the grievance regarding certain buildings having become dilapidated.
3. The credentials of the petitioner are also doubtful in absence of any specific disclosure. Moreover, the documents obtained are through his own counsel under Right to Information Act.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authorities by bringing into their notice all the relevant facts regarding the buildings dilapidated, if any.
5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. ) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 7.4.2025/Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench