APHC010159422024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE No.1959 of 2024 Between: St. Ann's Girls High School Cantonment ...PETITIONER AND Praveen Prakash and others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. L V S NAGARAJU The Court made the following: 2 VS,J C.C.No.1959 of 2024 ORDER : This contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in complying with the order dated 06.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3076 of 2024, whereby the said writ petition was disposed of in terms of the order dated 05.01.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30927 of 2002 & batch, with the following directions: “i) The respondent-authorities are hereby directed to permit the petitioners-institutions to fill up all the Aided vacancies in terms of G.O.Ms.No.1, Education, dated 01.01.1994 and also as per the Schedule prescribed under Sections 19 & 25 of the Act, 2009; ii) In future also, whenever vacancies arise, the institutions have to make applications to the Competent authorities for filling up the vacancies; iii) On such applications, the Competent authorities shall inform the institution about the availability of qualified surplus staff, within a period of (04) weeks from the date of application and allot said surplus staff on permanent basis; iv) If surplus staff are not available, the Competent authority shall inform the same and permit the petitioners-institutions to fill up the vacancies in accordance with the above said Rule, preferably within a period of two (02) months; v) So far as minority institutions are concerned, the above procedure is not applicable insofar as allotment of surplus staff are concerned, in view of the Judgments of Division Bench of this Court rendered in Modern High School Zamisthanpur v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and others [2002 (1) ALD 96] and Ester Axene Res. High School and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others [MANU/AP/0045/ 2019]. vi) The entire exercise shall be completed by the respondent- authorities within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid order has already been complied 3 VS,J C.C.No.1959 of 2024 with by the respondents and, hence, prays to close the present contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, this contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this case shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 21.03.2025 IBL 4 VS,J C.C.No.1959 of 2024 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE No.1959 of 2024 Dt: 21.03.2025 IBL